XyDromatics VNA Clinical —
the non-device clinical archive.
Non-device software under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D).
Audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit (metadata correction, not
interpretation), hospital-grade HA pairing, full DICOM +
DICOMweb I/O, and a complete 21 CFR Part 11 audit trail. The
clinical-interpretation features — a Diagnostic Viewer and a
Clinical Reporting suite — ship in code but are locked and
un-licensable at GA, which is exactly what keeps the product
non-device: it can’t be used to clinically interpret
stored images in patient treatment.
Because the Diagnostic Viewer + Reporting stay locked and
un-licensable, the GA product is non-device software under
FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D).
A code boundary that mirrors a regulatory boundary.
All five XyDromatics VNA products are non-device software
today under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D) — storage and forwarding
without clinical interpretation. What separates VNA Clinical
(and Clinical Research) from Repository, Migration, and
Research is that they carry the clinical-INTERPRETATION
features — a Diagnostic Viewer and a Clinical Reporting suite
— in code. In the GA build those features are locked
and un-licensable, so the product still can’t
be used to clinically interpret stored images in patient
treatment. That locked boundary is what keeps it non-device.
We could have shipped one binary with everything
license-gated. We chose not to. Shipping separate executables
on separate ports means the interpretation code never runs
inside the non-device-only processes — the boundary is a code
boundary, not just a license check. Because the Diagnostic
Viewer + Reporting stay locked and un-licensable in every
shipped build, VNA Clinical remains non-device software under
FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D).
Non-device-only siblings
Repository · Migration · Research
FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D) · no interpretation code shipped
Carry interpretation features (locked at GA)
Clinical · Clinical Research
Non-device software · §520(o)(1)(D)
Capabilities
What ships at GA — and what stays locked.
Two clinical-interpretation capabilities (marked
Locked at GA)
ship in code but are un-licensable in the GA build — which is
what keeps the product non-device under §520(o)(1)(D).
Everything else is available + licensable now and stays within
the non-device boundary, comparable to VNA Repository with
stricter availability and audit requirements.
Clinical-tag-edit
A GA non-device capability: it corrects DICOM METADATA, it does not interpret images. License-gated, audit-trailed, second-person sign-off.
Required reason text for every edit — captured in audit trail
Second-person electronic-signature workflow (21 CFR Part 11 §11.50)
Pre-edit + post-edit content fully retained — edits never destroy original
Configurable per-tag policies (which tags can be edited, by whom, with what approval)
Withdraw/re-issue downstream notifications when key tags change
Diagnostic Viewer
Locked at GA
A clinical-interpretation capability that ships in code but is LOCKED and un-licensable at GA — enabled only for Synthology development partners under a separate, non-commercial arrangement, never for customers. It cannot be enabled in the shipped GA build, which is what keeps the product non-device under §520(o)(1)(D).
Cornerstone3D rendering with MPR and 3D volume rendering
Present in code, locked & un-licensable at GA — not reachable in the shipped build
Clinical Reporting suite
Locked at GA
A clinical-interpretation capability that ships in code but is LOCKED and un-licensable at GA — enabled only for Synthology development partners under a separate, non-commercial arrangement, never for customers. It cannot be enabled in the shipped GA build, which is what keeps the product non-device under §520(o)(1)(D).
Self-contained reporting workspace with voice-recognition dictation
Session-binding for signatures (signature applies to specific records, not bulk)
Audit-record export for inspection / litigation
Audit retention separable from study retention (audit can outlast the study)
Operations & administration
The day-to-day surfaces operators use, plus tight change-control tooling for the clinical-tag-edit policies.
Web administration UI (shared sidebar shell, consistent across XyDromatics)
Role-based access control with permission catalog
Real-time dashboard — ingest, retrieval, audit-event volume, HA health
Change-control workflow for any configuration touching clinical-tag-edit policies
SynthQMS integration — every config change becomes a QMS-controlled record
Direct integration with the validation report set
Use cases
Three typical clinical-archive patterns.
All three patterns run on the non-device GA build — storage,
audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit, and non-interpretive workflow.
Clinical interpretation stays in your existing viewer and
reporting tools — VNA Clinical’s own Diagnostic Viewer +
Reporting are locked at GA, which keeps the product non-device
under §520(o)(1)(D).
Pattern 1
Clinical archive replacement
Replace a legacy clinical PACS archive with VNA Clinical. Same modality flow, same EMR integration, with audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit on top of the non-device store-and-forward you'd get from VNA Repository.
Flow
1Modalities + Router forward studies to VNA Clinical
2Diagnostic reports flow in via HL7 ORU / DICOM SR / FHIR DiagnosticReport
4Long-term storage tier mirrors VNA Repository feature set
5Clinical interpretation stays in your existing viewer/reporting tools — VNA Clinical's own viewer + reporting are locked at GA
Pattern 2
Tag-correction workflow consolidation
Today, tag corrections live in 4-6 different systems (PACS native edit, RIS, modality QC station, EMR override, manual ticket). Consolidate to one auditable workflow inside VNA Clinical.
Flow
1Tag-correction request enters the queue (HL7-driven, RIS-driven, or manual)
2Authorized user (per RBAC + per-tag policy) opens the edit in the audit-trailed UI
3Required reason text + second-person sign-off captured
4Edit applied; downstream subscribers notified per policy
5Audit log retains pre + post for the full retention window
Pattern 3
Dual-deployment with VNA Repository
Customers running VNA Repository as the primary archive can layer VNA Clinical for the audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit + report-routing workflow without disturbing the retention-tier archive.
Flow
1VNA Repository remains the long-term retention archive
2VNA Clinical handles the clinical-tag-edit + report-integration workflow on a subset of active studies
3Synchronization replicates corrected tags from Clinical back to Repository
4Both products are non-device software under §520(o)(1)(D)
5Customers ready to consolidate can later collapse to VNA Clinical Research (combined posture)
Integration points
What VNA Clinical connects to.
A clinical archive integrates deeply with the EMR and the
reporting layer — bidirectional report-object sync and context
launch — all within the non-device boundary (it transports
report objects; it does not interpret images at GA). Acting as
the critical-results notification system of record is not part
of the non-device build under §520(o)(1)(D).
Report transport (report objects move; authoring is locked at GA)
HL7 ORU, DICOM SR, FHIR DiagnosticReport — inbound for legacy reports, outbound for results distribution
Report-to-study linkage and reverse navigation
The native Clinical Reporting suite (authoring, dictation, templates, PowerScribe / Fluency migration) ships in code but is locked & un-licensable at GA
Because native authoring stays locked, the product remains non-device under §520(o)(1)(D)
Interpretation + report authoring stay in your existing reporting tools
Storage & catalog (shared with VNA Repository)
Local filesystem (default for small deployments)
S3-compatible object stores
On-prem NAS (NFS / SMB)
PostgreSQL / SQL Server / Oracle catalog
No SQLite for VNA family (standing engineering rule)
Authentication, audit, observability
OIDC / SAML for the web admin UI with second-person sign-off
Active Directory / Azure AD federation
Prometheus metrics + structured JSON logs
SynthQMS integration for change control
Hash-chain audit log with independent verification
Regulatory
Non-device software under §520(o)(1)(D).
A calm, plain statement of where VNA Clinical sits. The line is
simple: a non-device cannot aid or produce any information that
is acted upon in the treatment of a patient. No pending
submission, no timeline to wait on — just the boundary that
keeps the GA product non-device.
Classification
Non-device software
Non-device software under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D) — storage,
forwarding, and non-interpretive workflow. No FDA Device
Listing required; no premarket review applicable.
Interpretation features
Present in code, locked at GA
The Diagnostic Viewer and Clinical Reporting suite ship in
code but are locked and un-licensable in the GA build. They
can’t be enabled, so the product can’t be used to
clinically interpret images in patient treatment.
Boundary
A code boundary, not a license check
The interpretation code ships in separate executables on
separate ports and is locked & un-licensable, so it never
runs in the shipped build. The product stays non-device under
§520(o)(1)(D) — no current status to revisit, no pending
submission.
VNA Clinical is available as non-device software under FD&C Act
§520(o)(1)(D). The clinical-interpretation features stay locked
and un-licensable in the shipped build, which is what keeps the
product non-device. See
/regulatory for the full posture.
System requirements & sizing
Sized to clinical study volume + HA mandatory.
HA pairing is mandatory at every tier — this is a clinical
system, not an archive you can take down for an evening of
maintenance. Tiers below are starting points; final sizing
comes out of discovery and accounts for retention windows +
DR-site requirements.
Tier
Study volume
CPU
RAM
HA topology
Typical site
Hospital (single)
< 1,000 studies / day
8 vCPU per node
32 GB per node
Active-active HA pair (mandatory)
Community hospital, regional reading group.
Health-system
1,000 – 5,000 studies / day
16 vCPU per node
64 GB per node
Active-active HA pair, multi-AZ
Multi-hospital health system.
Academic medical center
5,000 – 15,000 studies / day
32 vCPU per node, 3+ nodes
128 GB per node
Active-active cluster, multi-AZ + DR site
Tertiary referral center, trauma center.
Enterprise / IDN
> 15,000 studies / day
64 vCPU per node, 5+ nodes per site
256 GB per node
Federated multi-site, each with HA cluster
Large IDN, national reading network.
Full hardware/software requirements are in
DOC-2026-059 (HW/SW Requirements),
available under NDA. Includes OS support matrix, supported
databases (with version ranges), HA topology requirements,
DR-site recommendations, and network requirements.
Licensing
Three packages.
Core gives you a clinical-grade archive without the
tag-edit feature — useful for environments that want the
higher availability + audit trail without the audit-trailed
tag-edit workflow yet. Tag-Edit adds the metadata-correction
capability. Enterprise unlocks federation, DR, and FHIR R4.
All three are non-device GA tiers under §520(o)(1)(D).
The clinical-interpretation features — the Diagnostic Viewer
and the Clinical Reporting suite — are not licensable
at GA. They ship in code but are locked and
un-licensable, which is what keeps the product non-device
under §520(o)(1)(D).
VNA Clinical Core
The base non-device clinical archive. Full DICOM + DICOMweb + audit trail. Clinical-tag-edit is included but feature-gated by license — you can deploy without enabling it if your clinical workflow doesn't require it.
Full DICOM + DICOMweb feature parity with VNA Repository
Hospital-grade HA pair
Diagnostic-report transport (HL7 ORU + DICOM SR)
21 CFR Part 11-aligned audit trail
Up to 1 PB archive capacity
VNA Clinical + Tag-Edit
Adds the audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit capability (metadata correction, not interpretation) with second-person sign-off and per-tag policy controls. A non-device GA capability.
Everything in Core
Clinical-tag-edit workflow
Per-tag editable / locked policy configuration
Second-person electronic-signature requirements
Withdraw / re-issue notifications on critical tag changes
Up to 5 PB archive capacity
VNA Clinical Enterprise
Everything, plus FHIR R4, multi-site federation, and advanced audit features.
Pricing structure mirrors VNA Repository (per-deployment,
capacity-tiered), reflecting the additional availability + audit
+ support requirements of a clinical-grade archive. Multi-product
bundles (VNA Repository + VNA Clinical + Router) get bundle
pricing. Specific pricing in your engagement SOW.
Documentation
The controlled-document set.
Every VNA Clinical deployment ships with the documents below, all
managed under SynthQMS document control. The DICOM Conformance
Statement is publicly available; the rest are shared under mutual NDA.
Document
Title
Notes
DOC-2026-131
Hardware & Software Requirements (VNA Clinical)
Sizing, OS support, dependencies
DOC-2026-141
DICOM Conformance Statement (VNA Clinical)
Public — full SOP class + transfer-syntax matrix
DOC-2026-136
EULA Annex (VNA Clinical)
Annex to the Synthology Master EULA (DOC-2026-063)
DOC-2026-151
Penetration Test Results (VNA Clinical)
Available under NDA
DOC-2026-146
QA Runner Manual (VNA Clinical)
Internal QA + customer-validated test runs
DOC-2026-161
User Guide (VNA Clinical)
Operator + administrator workflows
DOC-2026-167
Installation Guide (VNA Clinical)
Includes MSI deploy + Linux tarball install
Frequently asked
The questions prospects ask.
Why is this a separate product from VNA Repository?
Both are non-device software under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D). What sets VNA Clinical apart is that it carries the clinical-interpretation features — a Diagnostic Viewer and a Clinical Reporting suite — in code. In the GA build those features are locked and un-licensable, so VNA Clinical still can't be used to clinically interpret stored images in patient treatment, which is what keeps it non-device. We ship the interpretation code in separate executables on separate ports so that the non-device-only siblings (Repository, Migration, Research) never carry it at all — the boundary is a code boundary, not just a license flag.
What does "clinical-tag-edit" actually mean?
The ability to correct DICOM tags that carry clinical meaning after ingest — PatientName, PatientID, AccessionNumber, StudyDescription, BodyPartExamined, ProcedureCodeSequence, and others per institutional policy. Tag corrections are a real clinical need (wrong-patient-on-modality, mis-coded orders, EMR-VNA divergence, etc.). Crucially, this edits METADATA — it does not interpret images — so it stays within the non-device boundary. The feature is license-gated, audit-trailed, and requires second-person sign-off per 21 CFR Part 11 §11.50.
What's the regulatory classification?
VNA Clinical is non-device software at GA under FD&C Act §520(o)(1)(D). The clinical-interpretation features (Diagnostic Viewer + Reporting) ship in code but are locked and un-licensable, so the GA product is not a medical device and needs no premarket review. Because those features can't be enabled, the product cannot be used to clinically interpret stored images in patient treatment — which is exactly the boundary that keeps it non-device.
Can we use the Diagnostic Viewer or Reporting today?
Not for clinical interpretation. Both ship in the GA build but are locked and un-licensable — they cannot be enabled. Today, clinical interpretation and report authoring stay in your existing viewer and reporting tools; VNA Clinical handles storage, DICOM / DICOMweb I/O, audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit, and report-object transport (HL7 ORU / DICOM SR / FHIR DiagnosticReport). Because the viewer + reporting stay locked, the product remains non-device under §520(o)(1)(D).
Is the clinical-tag-edit feature locked off in the MSI?
No — clinical-tag-edit is a non-device GA capability. It ships in every VNA Clinical install and is enabled by license entitlement (a deliberate design control, audit-trailed, with second-person sign-off). The features that ARE locked and un-licensable at GA are the clinical-interpretation ones — the Diagnostic Viewer and the Clinical Reporting suite. The non-device-only siblings (Repository, Migration, Research) physically cannot run any of this code — it ships in a different binary.
How does this interact with our existing PACS / RIS for tag corrections?
Most environments have 4–6 places where tag corrections happen today (PACS native edit, RIS, modality QC station, EMR override, manual tickets). VNA Clinical can serve as the system of record for clinical-tag-edit, with integration paths back to source systems. This is itself an implementation engagement; we don't recommend turning the feature on without a workflow-design phase that maps every existing correction path to the new system.
What's the upgrade path from VNA Repository?
Data-preserving in-place upgrade. Same catalog DB, same storage backend, additive feature set. The catalog row schema is forward-compatible; the binary swap activates the new capabilities. Downtime depends on the HA configuration: with an HA pair the upgrade is rolling (one node at a time), with a single node it's typically a 30-60 minute maintenance window. License entitlement controls which features are reachable post-upgrade.
What about VNA Clinical Research?
A combined Clinical + Research host for institutions that operate both production clinical archives and de-identified research workflows. Same non-device posture under §520(o)(1)(D) — it also carries the interpretation features in code, locked at GA — with research-mode lanes added for de-identified study sets. See /products/vna-clinical-research for details. Pick that sibling if you want both postures in one binary; pick VNA Clinical if your research data lives elsewhere.
Plan a clinical-archive deployment.
VNA Clinical is available now as non-device software —
storage, audit-trailed clinical-tag-edit, and non-interpretive
clinical workflow. The clinical-interpretation features
(Diagnostic Viewer + Reporting) stay locked and un-licensable,
which keeps the product non-device under §520(o)(1)(D).
We’ll talk through the deployment that fits your
environment.